பயனர்:Photonique/மணல்தொட்டி: திருத்தங்களுக்கு இடையிலான வேறுபாடு
உள்ளடக்கம் நீக்கப்பட்டது உள்ளடக்கம் சேர்க்கப்பட்டது
சி Avoid indirect criticism -> மரைமுகமான விமரிசனம் தவிற்க |
சி /* How to avoid abuse of talk pages -> உரையாடல் பக்கங்களில் பகடி பேச்சை தவிற்பது |
||
வரிசை 48:
Of course criticism communicated in any manner and concerning any subject must be [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]], should assume good faith as described in the [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|relevant guideline]], should not constitute [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|biting of newcomers]], and should comply with other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If directed generally towards an editor's behavior or other aspects of talk page commentary, criticism '''must not''' constitute a ''personal attack'' as described in the [[WP:NPA|"no personal attacks"]] policy. See also the essay [[Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks|"Avoid personal remarks"]] for a viewpoint on the latter form of criticism.
== உரையாடல் பக்கங்களில் பகடி பேச்சை தவிற்பது ==
{{shortcut|WP:AVOIDABUSE}}
* Most people take pride in their work and in their point of view. Egos can easily get hurt in editing, but talk pages are not a place for striking back. They are a good place to ''comfort'' or undo damage to egos, but most of all they are for forging agreements that are best for the articles to which they are attached. If someone disagrees with you, try to understand why, and in your discussion on the talk pages take the time to provide good reasons why you think that your way is better.
| |||