விக்கிப்பீடியா:விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்/மதிப்பீடு

விக்கிப்பீடியா:WikiProject Film/Sidebar Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Film! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Film articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Film}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Film articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions தொகு

How can I get my article rated?: Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?: Any member of the Film WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating?: You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?: Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions தொகு

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்}} project banner on its talk page:

{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=}}

தர மதிப்பீடு தொகு

Articles are automatically placed in an appropriate subcategory of பகுப்பு:தர வாரியாக திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள் by adding a label to the class parameter of the project banner:

{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=FA}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:FA-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=FL}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:FL-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=GA}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:GA-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=B}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:B-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=C}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:C-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=Start}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:Start-Class film articles
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=குறுங்கட்டுரை}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:குறுங்கட்டுரை தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=பட்டியல்}} adds an article to பகுப்பு:பட்டியல் தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்

கட்டுரை பெயர்வெளியில் இல்லாத பக்கங்களை இவ்வாறு வகைப்படுத்தலாம்.

{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=பக்கவழி நெறிப்படுத்தல்}} adds a page to பகுப்பு:பக்கவழி நெறிப்படுத்தல் தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=பகுப்பு}} adds a page to பகுப்பு:பகுப்பு தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=வார்ப்புரு}} adds a page to பகுப்பு:வார்ப்புரு தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்
{{விக்கித் திட்டம் திரைப்படம்|class=பிற}} adds a page to பகுப்பு:பிற தர திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்

If the class parameter is left empty, the article or page will be placed in பகுப்பு:தர மதிப்பிடப்படாத திரைப்பட கட்டுரைகள்

You should not arbitrarily assign FA, FL or GA grades to an article. To receive these grades, an article must first pass through these processes for approval:

Core articles தொகு

In lieu of a moribund importance rating, the project has deprecated the importance parameter in favor of a targeted drive towards "core"-type articles as determined by consensus in external lists and polls rather than individual editorial whim. This work is concentrated at the Core department of this WikiProject.

Film grading scheme தொகு

வார்ப்புரு:Film grading scheme

Requests for assessment தொகு

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. (Note that this is not required; any editor may assess or re-assess an article on their own, if acting in good faith.)

If you assess an article, please strike it off so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Comments are not mandatory and any should be left at the article's talk page; the list below will be wiped periodically.

~~Sir No Sir - Completely re-written and lots of references Diamondgurl77 (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)~~
~~The Wedding March (1928 film) - requesting reassessment.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)~~
Absolution (1978 film) - Initially a stub, I expanded five times in August last year, adding a plot summary, sections on production, cut scenes and critical reception; and most importantly references.--Ykraps (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
International Cycling Film Festival - Completely re-written incl. info box, pictures, references etc. Bicycle minister 09:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Closed Curtain - Requesting reassessment. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Ah Boys to Men requested for assesment by User:Bonkers The Clown. Looks pretty good, and I think GA is a lock, but I am unfamiliar with process for Singaporean films. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Bringing up Baby - requesting reassessment. --64.134.128.139 (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Kim Possible (character) - Completely re-written and sourced. Hoping for B-Class rating.--Changedforbetter (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Dark Side of the Moon (film) - Almost completely rewritten and taken into account the remarks from the previous assessmentJlbruyelle (talk) 21:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorcerer (film) - The article was virtually rewritten from scratch, its earlier incarnation was rated as a stub. Numerous sources are provided. Expecting between B-Class and A-Class. Salt The Fries 86 (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.

Statistics தொகு

Current status தொகு

Assessment log தொகு

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality log